‍Demo Requests – Volume & Week-over-Week Changes

Overall Volume: In the second week of Feb 2025, total inbound demo requests reached 13,274, a slight -1.3% dip from the first week of Feb (13,451). Despite this small decline, demand was still up +2.4% compared to the week of Jan 27 (12,957), continuing the upward trend seen since mid-January. This suggests that interest remained strong into February, even after a peak in the first week.

‍

Notable Industry Trends:

• Retail & eCommerce Software: Demo request volume dropped from 1,216 in Week 1 to 915 in Week 2 (approx -25% WoW). The decline was most pronounced at one enterprise-scale company in this segment, which alone saw 689 requests but only 9.4% qualified. This indicates a campaign that drew a high volume of low-quality leads. In contrast, smaller Retail tech firms in Week 2 saw far fewer demo requests but much higher lead quality (as noted below), highlighting the disparity between broad enterprise campaigns and targeted SMB efforts.
  
  
• Manufacturing & Supply Chain Software: Demo demand surged steadily. After a spike in early Feb, Week 2 hit 912 requests, nearly double the volume from late January. This sustained growth suggests successful marketing momentum in this vertical.
  
  
• Healthcare & Medical Software: Week 1 saw a peak of ~1,150 demo requests, normalizing to 884 in Week 2. Even with the pullback, volume remained above late-Jan levels (982), indicating continued strong interest post-campaign.
  
  
• Data & Analytics Software: Continued an upward trajectory, from 490 demos in late Jan to 565 in Week 1, and 607 in Week 2. This steady climb reflects growing demand, potentially due to effective content or word-of-mouth in this niche.
  ‍
  
• HR and Sales Software: These stayed relatively steady. Sales tech hovered around 1,100+ demos each week, ending Week 2 at 1,166 (virtually flat WoW). HR tech dipped in Week 1 then rebounded to 868 demos in Week 2, roughly on par with late Jan. The consistency in these core SaaS segments suggests a stable pipeline of interest without dramatic spikes or drops week-to-week.

By Company Size: Standard SaaS segmentation shows that mid-market firms (51–200 employees) contributed the largest share of demos (~6,356 in Week 2, ~48% of total), while SMBs (≤50 employees) generated ~5,253 demos (~40%) and enterprises (>200 employees) about 1,665 (~12%). Notably, the slight overall dip in Week 2 volume came largely from a pullback at the enterprise level (fewer broad top-of-funnel leads), whereas SMB and mid-market interest held strong. Marketers can use this insight to balance targeting: sustaining the mid-market momentum and refining broad enterprise campaigns to improve quality.

‍

Lead Qualification % – Are Campaigns Attracting the Right Prospects?

Overall Qualification: The qualification rate (percent of demo requests that met criteria) ticked down for the second week in a row. Week 2 saw 67.2% of demo requests qualified, down from 68.8% in Week 1 and 70.0% in late Jan. This slight decline suggests that while marketing kept volumes high, a growing portion of those leads fell outside the ideal customer profile. It’s a sign that some campaigns in early February cast a wider net, capturing more top-of-funnel interest that didn’t fully match sales qualifications.

Campaign Effectiveness by Segment:

• High-Quality Segments: Manufacturing & Industrial Software maintained exceptionally high lead quality. Even as volume grew, 81% of Week 2 demo requests were qualified (down slightly from ~93% in late Jan, but still among the highest). Similarly, Data & Analytics Software leads were ~80% qualified in Week 2, reflecting precise targeting in that niche. These high percentages indicate marketing campaigns in these segments are effectively attracting the right prospects with minimal noise.
  ‍
• Low-Quality Segments: Retail & eCommerce saw a significant drop in lead quality. The qualification rate plunged from ~39% in Week 1 to just 28.4% in Week 2 – meaning nearly 3 out of 4 retail demo requests were disqualified. This was largely due to the aforementioned enterprise campaign which contributed hundreds of unqualified signups. It’s a clear sign that marketing outreach in this segment needs tightening (e.g. more targeted messaging or pre-qualification on the form) to filter out irrelevant leads. On the bright side, retail leads that did qualify tended to be highly engaged (as we’ll see in meeting conversion).
  ‍
• Mid-Range Segments: Most other industries hovered in a healthy middle ground. HR Software maintained ~74% qualification, and Sales Tech improved to 66.9% in Week 1, then 64.1% in Week 2 – a positive trend from 60.3% in late Jan. Healthcare & Medical stayed around 41–44% qual rate, stable despite volume fluctuations. These consistent figures suggest that targeting for these segments remained relatively on-point, with no major shifts in lead quality week-over-week.
  ‍

By Company Size: Lead quality varied by company segment, indicating differences in marketing reach:

• SMBs (≤50 employees) had the highest qualification rate ~72% in Week 2. Smaller companies often attract more self-selecting prospects (or use stricter form qualifiers), leading to fewer unqualified demos.
• Mid-Market (51–200 employees) leads were ~68.5% qualified, a strong rate given their volume. This suggests marketing is effectively targeting mid-market buyers at scale, keeping the funnel efficient.
• Enterprises (>200 employees) saw only ~46.7% of demo requests qualified in Week 2 – the lowest among segments. The broad brand presence of larger companies likely drives in many curious or out-of-profile inquiries (as seen in Retail). For marketing, this underscores the importance of refining outreach for enterprise campaigns: consider more precise audience targeting or clearer value messaging to attract decision-makers over tire-kickers. On the upside, the few enterprise leads that do qualify are highly valuable, as seen by their strong conversion to meetings.

‍

Inbound Meetings – Converting Qualified Leads to Meetings

Overall Conversion to Meetings: In Week 2, customers scheduled 5,225 inbound meetings with qualified prospects. This was down about -5% WoW (from 5,496 in Week 1) and slightly below the late Jan figure (5,512). The dip in meetings mirrors the slight drop in qualified leads, with an added effect: some qualified leads in Week 2 did not translate into meetings (as reflected in a lower meeting rate, covered next). The inbound demo-to-meeting funnel for Week 2 can be summarized as: 13,274 demo requests → 8,926 qualified → 5,225 meetings scheduled. Marketers should note that roughly 40% of all demo requests ultimately became meetings this week (compared to ~41% in Week 1), highlighting where improvements can be made post-lead capture.

Successes: Several industries demonstrated strong conversion of their qualified leads into meetings:

• Healthcare & Medical Software rebounded in follow-through – with 67% of qualified health-tech leads booking meetings in Week 2 (up from ~62% the week prior). This suggests better sales engagement or lead intent in the second week after a campaign spike.
• Data & Analytics and Financial Software both consistently converted around 60%+ of qualified leads to meetings (e.g., Data/Analytics was ~60.3% in Week 2). These solid rates imply an effective handoff from marketing to sales: leads are not only qualified, but sales teams are successfully getting them to schedule time.
• Sales Automation Software also improved: about 53.4% of qualified sales-tech prospects booked meetings in Week 2, up from ~50% in late January. This gradual rise suggests tweaks in the inbound process (or simply highly interested prospects) are yielding better meeting conversion in this segment.

Challenges: A few segments had a tougher time converting leads to meetings in Week 2:

• Support Software saw the steepest drop-off at the meeting stage. Despite 67% qualification, only 35% of those qualified leads actually booked a meeting – a sharp decline from ~60% the week before. This indicates that even though the right people are coming in, something is preventing them from scheduling (potentially lack of immediate follow-up or lower urgency for a demo in this category). It’s a clear area for operational improvement.
• Some small-business customers also showed friction after qualification. For instance, one small tech company (categorized as “Other”) qualified 100% of its 545 demo requests but only 35.6% resulted in meetings. Such cases suggest that while the marketing filters were effective, many interested prospects didn’t take the final step to schedule time with sales. Causes could range from timing conflicts to hesitation or a need for personal outreach.

Team Capacity: The overall number of meetings per user (sales rep) remained within typical range (as seen in previous reports), but the distribution of those meetings is shifting with trends. The surge in Manufacturing and stable high volume in EdTech and SalesTech mean certain teams are handling a larger meeting load, whereas a dip in Retail meetings might free up some capacity. Operations should ensure that high-growth segments (e.g., Manufacturing) have enough sales calendars open to accommodate the influx of meetings, so no qualified lead waits too long for an available slot. Meanwhile, segments seeing fewer meetings (e.g., Retail in Week 2) can use the breather to follow up on unbooked leads.

‍

“Meetings Not Booked” – Where Are Leads Dropping Off?

Even after prospects are qualified, not all end up booking a meeting. In Week 2, about 3,701 qualified leads did not convert to a meeting, which is 37% of all qualified demos (3 points higher drop-off than late Jan). Understanding where this drop-off is highest can help address bottlenecks:

• Top of Funnel vs. Scheduling: Across the board, more leads are lost in initial qualification (approx. 4,348 were disqualified in Week 2) than in scheduling. However, the scheduling step still saw a significant leakage of nearly 4 in 10 qualified leads. This was most pronounced in segments like Support Software (where 65% of qualified leads didn’t book as noted) and specific SMB accounts that lacked follow-through.
• Industry Drop-off Extremes: Support Software’s drop-off (only 35% meeting rate) stands out as the highest. On the other hand, some segments had minimal drop-off: Retail’s qualified leads that week were few but fairly eager – about 70% of qualified retail leads booked meetings, meaning only 19 out of 65 qualified did not schedule. Enterprise IT/Security (not highlighted above) likely saw a similar pattern of lower volume, higher intent among those who pass the qual stage.
• Root Causes: High “not booked” rates often point to process gaps rather than lead quality. In Support Software, for example, qualified prospects might have been left waiting too long for a follow-up, or the demo offered didn’t seem urgent. In small companies with 100% quals but low booking, it could be a simple matter of bandwidth – a lean team may not chase every lead immediately, or automated follow-ups might be insufficient to prompt action.

How to Address It: For Marketing and Ops, the task is to plug the leak at the scheduling stage:

• Marketing’s Role: Ensure that once a lead is qualified, they are seamlessly handed over to sales. This can include trigger-based nurturing – e.g. an immediate, personalized email to qualified leads encouraging them to pick a time (RevenueHero already automates scheduling, but the messaging around the value of that meeting can be bolstered). Marketing can also analyze if certain campaigns consistently yield qualified-but-unbooked leads. If so, adjust the call-to-action or clarity of next steps in those campaigns. For instance, if a content download is bringing in good leads who don’t book, maybe the follow-up needs to highlight the benefits of a live demo more strongly.
• Operations’ Role: The ops team should focus on rapid response and follow-through. A best practice is for sales reps or BDRs to reach out to qualified leads within hours if they haven’t self-scheduled. A friendly nudge (a call or a personal email) can dramatically improve booking rates for those on-the-fence leads. In segments with high drop-off (like Support), implement a task for reps to personally engage those leads – answer questions, alleviate concerns, and manually schedule if needed. Also, review if the scheduling process has any friction: although RevenueHero automates booking, ensure meeting slots are appropriately configured (e.g., enough availability, proper time-zone accommodations) so that eager prospects don’t hit a wall when trying to book.

By identifying exactly where prospects fall off, teams can take targeted actions – for example, in Support Software, prioritize immediate outreach, whereas in segments like Retail, the focus should be upstream on lead quality (since those who qualify are actually booking well).

‍

Inbound Meeting Rate by Industry – Performance & Optimization Opportunities

The Inbound Meeting Rate (meetings booked vs. qualified leads) is a key efficiency metric, and it varies by industry. Overall it was 58.5% in Week 2 (down from 60.7% late Jan). Breaking this down uncovers which sectors are converting best and where to optimize:

• Top Performers: Several industries consistently hit ~60% or higher meeting rates. Financial & Accounting Software and Data & Analytics Software hover around 60–62% conversion of qualified leads. Healthcare jumped to ~67% as mentioned. These high rates suggest that once leads are vetted in these sectors, they have a strong intent to talk – an opportunity for sales to accelerate deals. Marketing and sales should consider if anything further can speed up these conversions (for example, highlighting fast-track options or offering on-demand demos to capitalize on that intent).
• Mid-tier Converters: Sales Software improved to a 53.4% meeting rate, and Education & E-Learning companies averaged around the mid-50s as well. These are decent benchmarks but could potentially reach the 60% club with tweaks. For instance, sales teams could experiment with one-click meeting confirmations or direct phone outreach for warm leads in these segments to bump the rate up a few points.
• Lagging Segments: As noted, Support Software was a low outlier at 35% in Week 2. Other smaller segments or one-off cases in the “Other” category also had sub-40% rates (often tied to unique situations at those companies). These are the segments with greatest room for improvement. For support-focused leads, consider tailoring the approach: maybe these prospects prefer a quick email exchange or a trial first, so offering alternative next steps might re-engage some who didn’t book outright. The key is recognizing that a one-size-fits-all follow-up might not work here.

By Company Size: Interestingly, meeting rates were fairly consistent across mid-market and enterprise qualified leads (~59–60% booked), while SMBs trailed slightly (~57%). This could indicate that larger companies have more robust sales follow-up processes or that their leads, once qualified, are more sales-ready. Smaller companies might let more qualified leads lapse due to resource constraints. To bridge this gap, SMB teams can adopt some enterprise practices – for example, setting up automated reminders or dedicating at least a part-time resource to promptly engage every qualified lead, ensuring high intent doesn’t go to waste.

‍

Key Takeaways & Actionable Insights

1. Marketing Insights – Improving Lead Quality & Engagement:

• Double Down on What’s Working: Campaigns in high-converting industries (Manufacturing, Data/Analytics, Financial SaaS) are yielding both quality and meetings. These segments saw 80%+ lead qualification and ~60% meeting rates, driving efficient pipeline growth. Marketing should consider allocating more budget or resources to these channels/verticals, as they are attracting the right audience who are likely to convert to opportunities.
  ‍
• Refine Broad Campaigns: The dip in overall qualification to 67% (from 70%) suggests certain campaigns (e.g. in Retail & eComm) pulled in too many unqualified leads. Analyze those sources: if a particular ad or content offer is bringing volume but low conversion, tweak the targeting parameters or messaging. For instance, if a Retail webinar attracted a general crowd, the follow-up content could be adjusted to filter interest (e.g., a required field about business type) before counting as a demo request. The goal is to lift that Retail qual rate back up closer to 40–50% as seen in January by weeding out non-prospects.
  ‍
• Sustain Mid-Market Momentum: With mid-market firms contributing nearly half of inbound demand, ensure marketing keeps tailoring content to mid-sized pain points. Their solid 68.5% qual rate shows current messaging is resonating. Any new campaigns should build on this (case studies of similar-sized clients, ROI calculators, etc.) to continue attracting and qualifying mid-market leads at scale.
  ‍
• Nurture the Nearly-converted: For segments with high “meetings not booked” counts, marketing can assist sales by running lead nurture touches. For example, send a helpful case study or a short personalized video from an AE to every qualified lead that hasn’t booked after 24 hours. This keeps your solution top-of-mind and provides additional value, which might tip them towards scheduling. Such touches are especially relevant in Support Software and SMB segments where an extra nudge is needed to push leads over the finish line.
  ‍

2. Operations Insights – Optimizing Conversion & Follow-Through:

• Immediate Action on Qualified Leads: The data clearly shows that when qualified leads don’t book quickly, many won’t book at all. Operations should enforce an SLA: every qualified lead that hasn’t self-scheduled within a short window (e.g. 1 business day) triggers a manual follow-up. This is crucial in segments like Support Software, where a personal touch could cut the 65% drop-off dramatically. Even a quick call to offer help scheduling can make a difference in converting those lingering leads.
  
  
• Leverage High-Intent Signals: Where inbound meeting rates are high, capitalize on that intent. For instance, healthcare and enterprise prospects who qualify are very likely to meet – make sure reps prioritize those and perhaps prepare tailored demo content in advance, since the meeting is probably happening.
  
  High intent leads should see faster cadences post-meeting as well, potentially accelerating the sales cycle. Ops can work with sales enablement to ensure playbooks are ready for the influx from Manufacturing and Data/Analytics segments that are coming in hot.
  
  
• Monitor Capacity & Distribution: As inbound interest shifts (e.g., manufacturing up, retail down), use RevenueHero’s routing data to ensure a balanced load. While the platform automates round-robin assignment, Ops can still adjust by prepping more reps to handle booming segments.
  
  For example, if one product line is seeing a demo surge, brief additional team members to take those meetings or extend available hours. The slight drop in meetings Week 2 isn’t alarming, but it’s a reminder to always align team capacity with demand – no qualified lead should fail to book due to lack of an available slot or rep.
  
  
• Continuous Feedback Loop:
  
  Finally, feed these insights back into marketing. If Ops notices, say, enterprise leads are often unqualified (as in Retail’s case with only 9% qual), loop in marketing to adjust targeting criteria.
  
  Conversely, when Ops sees stellar conversion (e.g. a campaign that yields 80% meeting rate), document what was done right in the follow-up process and standardize it across teams. This alignment ensures that both marketing and operations learn from weekly patterns: marketing generates better-qualified leads, and operations converts them at a higher rate, improving the inbound engine over time.